1 Contained, ane Republican, and ane reluctant Democrat gave Associates Speaker John Pérez the votes he needed to pass the nearly contentious piece of his Middle Class Scholarship Act .

Assembly Speaker John Pérez (D-Los Angeles), writer of the Middle Class Scholarship Act. (Click to overstate.)

The Act is a two-bill package consisting of AB 1500 and AB 1501; the latter creates the programme while the former establishes the funding source to pay for it. They both take to laissez passer or the Scholarship Human activity fails and, because they're urgency bills, both require a 2-thirds vote.

Last May, four Republican members of the Assembly joined with Democrats to push AB 1501 over the top, but they all refused to support AB 1500. Information technology would raise about $1 billion a year to fund the scholarship program by eliminating what Democrats says is a loophole that allows multi-land companies to pay lower taxes than California businesses, and what Republicans fence is a taxation increment that will make the state less attractive to businesses than it already is.

At the start of yesterday'due south Assembly debate, information technology appeared that AB 1500 would autumn curt by one, if non two, votes. As recently as Friday afternoon, Republican leaders said it was unlikely anyone in their conclave would cross the alley, and during the floor debate itself, Democrat Tony Mendoza of Artesia stood to explain why he could not support the bill.

By the time the Assembly voted about an hour later, Pérez had convinced Mendoza to switch, and Republican Assemblymember Brian Nestande of Palm Desert told his GOP colleagues that information technology was fourth dimension to do something they "may not normally practise."

"I'm putting along my effort, my vote, to say we need to come up together and work on some of these issues to bring businesses back to California and to grow the economy," said Nestande, giving the nib the minimum 54 votes it needed. .

Scholarship amounts at CSU and UC under the Middle Class Scholarship Act. Source: Assembly Speaker John Pérez. (Click to enlarge.)

The Middle Grade Scholarship program would provide fiscal aid to Cal State and Academy of California students whose family incomes are less than $150,000. The scholarships would embrace 2-thirds of the tuition at UC and CSU. Based on the current pupil population, nigh 150,000 Cal State students would receive over $4,000 a year, and some 42,000 UC students would become nearly $8,200 a year.Customs colleges are in for $150 meg to assist students pay for books, transportation and other college expenses, including fee waivers.

"1 of the greatest things that we could do is invest in education," argued Pérez during his closing comments.  "We know that the prosperity of the state has been tied to the success of our public academy systems, our great research institutions. When you look at that which has made innovation then successful in California, it'due south the co-location of business organization and great centers of education.  This allows united states to build on that tradition."

Republicans vehemently disagreed and said that irresolute the corporate tax formula could backlash on the very students the scholarship program seeks to aid. "I rise in opposition to this bill because information technology'due south a bad idea," said Twin Peaks Republican Tim Donnelly with feature bluntness. "We are literally investing in pedagogy and there aren't going to be any jobs for these kids considering nosotros keep driving businesses out of the country with unfriendly policies."

Staying single

Until final year, companies headquartered out of country but doing business here had to compute their California taxes based on three factors: sales, holding, and workforce or payroll. But California companies argued that the formula wasn't off-white to them because multi-state businesses could reduce their tax burden by not creating new jobs or expanding manufacturing facilities in the land.

In an effort to equalize the revenue enhancement burden, the Legislature inverse the constabulary to base of operations taxes solely on sales, a method known as the Single Sales Gene. In February 2009, in a airtight-door, middle-of-the-dark bargain to win Republican support for the budget, Democratic leaders as well gave the out-of-state businesses the pick of choosing whichever formula gave them the lowest tax bill.

In a May 2010 brief, the Legislative Analyst'south Office estimated that this tax selection would cost the country about $1 billion a year in revenues and go on the inequitable treatment of California companies.

"With near states' formulas now based only on sales, the old formula that used property and payroll could put some California producers at a competitive disadvantage. Assuasive firms to choose their formula every year arbitrarily favors some firms over others," wrote the Legislative Annotator.

Multi-land tax formulas across the country. (Pennsylvania'southward vote came too tardily for this chart). Source: Found on Taxation and Economic Policy, Baronial 2011. (Click to enlarge.)

California has been out of step with the national bipartisan trend on this outcome. Seventeen states , including Texas, New York, and New Jersey, have enacted a mandatory Unmarried Sales Gene rate. Terminal month, Pennsylvania'due south Republican Governor Tom Corbett signed his state's police force.

Gov. Jerry Brown would like to have that same opportunity, and he tried terminal twelvemonth with ABX1 40 . Simply neither that pecker nor SB 116, a similar ane introduced in the Senate by Los AngelesDemocrat Kevin De León, made information technology out of their houses of origin.

The same coalition of automakers, Chambers of Commerce, and manufacturers that blocked the final two measures are lobbying against AB 1500 this session. In a memo to members of the state Associates 2 months ago, they wrote that while the goal of the Scholarship Deed is laudable, irresolute the tax "will further erode California's ability to concenter and compete with other states for business investment and hiring."

Independent Nathan Fletcher of San Diego. Source: California Channel video. (Click to overstate.)

Simply opposition to a mandatory Single Sales Factor formula isn't universal among businesses in the state. A number of large high-tech companies, including Genentech, Qualcomm, Cisco, and BIOCOM, take appear their support for Pérez' bills.

Nathan Fletcher, the Legislature's just Independent, whose San Diego district includes Qualcomm, admonished Republican members for being more interested in helping giant out-of-state corporations, like the automakers Chrysler and General Motors, than in supporting local business and students.

"At the end of the day, every vote nosotros take upwards here is about choices and about values," Fletcher said to his colleagues, "and the option before you today is articulate: you lot're either going to stand with California employers or with out-of-land employers; you're either going to stand up with California students or with out-of-country employers."

In that location is also a competing measure, of sorts, coming up before voters this election day. Proposition 39, known as the California Make clean Energy Jobs Human activity , would, like AB 1500, brand the Single Sales Factor mandatory. However, instead of investing the revenue in a heart-grade scholarship plan, the money would fund projects that create make clean free energy jobs. Some coin would as well become into the state full general fund, where it would brand its manner to didactics through the regular channels.

But Prop 39 spokesperson Alexa Bluth said it's unlikely that both AB 1500 and the initiative would be enacted. "If AB 1500 passes, we will stand downwards from pushing for Suggestion 39," wrote Bluth in an email to EdSource Today.

AB 1500 and its companion bill, AB 1501, take passed their first challenge and are now in the Senate, but at that place, too, Democrats are two votes short of the necessary two-thirds needed to pass the Middle Class Scholarship Act. As one official commented, "To my knowledge, the Senate has no Nestandes or Fletchers."

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource'south no-toll daily electronic mail on latest developments in education.